G.H.W. Bush
Last night, I had the privilege of hearing former president George Herbert Walker Bush at
Jesus himself came to serve and not to be served, and we need to listen to those that God has raised up as his public servants when they remind us of our responsibility to sacrifice this way. While we as Christians must be committed to serving in the church, that is not enough. To often, we as Christians content ourselves to let others solve the world’s problems while we focus exclusively on the church. It is true that the world is helped as we serve in the church, but it is also true that the church is helped as we serve in these other areas. Jesus is King over all, community, state and nation, and he calls us to serve in those forums as well. So, listen to your leaders God has put over you (or former leaders) when they call you to serve. Get off of the sidelines in the world and give of yourself to others. In so doing, you listen to Jesus Christ.
Additionally, Bush said one of the things he misses about being President is all of the protesters all over the place. He recalled driving into San Francisco one time and seeing one lady, who he described as the ugliest lady he had ever seen, just outside the presidential limo with a placard saying “Stay out of my womb!” to which he immediately said, “NO PROBLEM, lady, NO PROBLEM!”
--
A couple of other random items:
It is truly a blessing to be a Protestant on Fridays in this Lenten season. Roman Catholics are, of course, not to eat red meat (mammals or birds) on Fridays at this time of year. However, there is great internal debate as to what water animals are acceptable. What about capybaras, beavers, geese, puffins, reptiles, and other marine animals? Apparently, at various times there have been exceptions granted for these who spend much time in the water. In some places it is rumored that muskrats are acceptable Friday fare. When one bishop was asked about this, he said that anyone willing to eat muskrat is already “doing penance worthy of the greatest saints”. Please pass the steak.
And finally, you know we live in a culture of excess when there are two rival leagues competing to be the official sanctioning body of Rocks-Paper-Scissors. The Wall Street Journal reports today that these two bitter foes host annual tournaments, with one offering a $50,000 grand prize.
3 Comments:
It was a pleasure indeed.
And as far as the rock-paper-scissor thing goes... that's just plain scary.
Why don't they just have a face off with their game of choice...I guess neither group thinks they have the upper hand.
Hey Pastor James! How's the Faris family? I hope yall are all well.
I have a question about baptism in relation to a conversation held at your house the last time I was there. It also relates to a short conversation I had with my pastor here tonight. My friend and I are starting a single women's class and he wanted to talk to us about it. Of course I knew he'd ask where I was and how I was doing in relation to where I stand on some issues. I'm glad he did though. I shared with him that I am still reading and studying some things, more specifically worship and baptism. That afternoon at yall's house, I can't remember exactly how you explained it, but I remember you saying something about the argument against infant baptism having something to do with Baptist not carrying out the reasoning all the way, b/c of the Catholics believing it "saves" the baby when that wasn't the belief of the reformers. (If I totally butchered that, could you explain that again.) (I think I'm confusing myself.) Anyway, it was brought up tonight that the reformers only had the doctrine of the Catholic church to go from, in other words they were trying to reform the Catholic church which held, and still holds the practice of infant baptism so that was something carried over. I don't know much church history, that's for sure, but where does Calvin's earnest study of the Holy Scriptures not come into account when infant baptism became a practice of the reformers? My question is did the reformers solely take that practice from the Catholics and change the meaning by looking at Scripture's teaching that baptism doesn't save, or did they find that infant baptism was biblical regardless of what the Catholics believed/did or not? I really hope all of that makes sense. My pastor said a lot of our practices/beliefs comes from the reformers just not the infant baptism one which goes along with the Anabaptists. Another would be Psalm singing, but I didn't bring that up. ;-) I brought up the point of "baby dedication", though. It wasn't directly responded to...oh well. If and when you get a chance to respond, I'd appreciate it. Tell Elizabeth I said Hello! I miss yall!
Post a Comment
<< Home